My only criticism of it thus far is that the photo is so big on the screen, I have to scroll around to see the whole thing (maybe that's just a simple settings issue?).
And when I went to the site's home page, there were quite a few photos of men's genitalia entitled,"Want to Play?" Not sure what their rules are with those types of things, but whether or not they're just artsy-fartsy nudes (which I have no problem with), I don't think the photos I usually take will quite go with that sort of thing.
2 comments:
My only criticism of it thus far is that the photo is so big on the screen, I have to scroll around to see the whole thing (maybe that's just a simple settings issue?).
And when I went to the site's home page, there were quite a few photos of men's genitalia entitled,"Want to Play?" Not sure what their rules are with those types of things, but whether or not they're just artsy-fartsy nudes (which I have no problem with), I don't think the photos I usually take will quite go with that sort of thing.
LOL ew! Those definately weren't photos that were posted when I was there earlier this morning. Hmmm. Maybe I won't bother with this.
I did submit a feedback on photo size suggesting that different size variations be offered for uploading such as the way Blogger does it.
Apparently they are implementing a fair number of options - they just don't have them up and running yet.
But I completely agree with the photo size - it's HUGE.
Thanks for the update!
Post a Comment